Tag: Madras High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CORAM:HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA Delivered on: May 27, 2016 CRL.A. 1403/2014 KARAN ….. AppellantRepresented by: Mr.Sunil Kumar, Advocate.versusSTATE ( NCT OF DELHI) ….. Respondent Represented by: Ms.Rajni Gupta, APP for theState with Inspector BirenderSingh, PS Shahdara. MUKTA GUPTA, J. 1. Aakash suffered a stab injury…

Continue Reading

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNALAMRITSAR BENCH; AMRITSAR BEFORE SH. A.D.JAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER ANDSH. T.S. KAPOOR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Date of pronouncement: 27.05.2016 I.T.A No.475(Asr)/2014 Dy. CIT Vs. Sh. Sakun Aggarwal Circle-VI, Pathankot. S/o Sh. Anil Aggarwal, Garden Colony, Pathankot PAN: AHPPA7621P (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.A No.478(Asr)/2014 Assessment Year: 2010-11 Sh. Sakun Aggarwal Vs. Dy. CIT S/o…

Continue Reading

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION (A.K. SIKRI)AND(PRAFULLA .C. PANT) JJ. MAY 27, 2016 CIVIL APPEAL NO.5252 OF 2016 (ARISING OUT OF S.L.P. (CIVIL) NO. 8988 OF 2014) STAR SPORTS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED …..APPELLANT(S) VERSUS PRASAR BHARATI & ORS. …..RESPONDENT(S) J U D G M E N T A.K. SIKRI, J. Leave…

Continue Reading

Witnesses The Supreme Court in the decisionreportedas(2012) 12 SCC 711 Busi Koteswara Rao and Ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradeshreiterating the decision of the larger Bench inMasalti Vs. State of U.P. AIR 1965 SC 2002held: Even, as early as in 1965, a larger Bench of this Court inMasalti v. State of U.P. [AIR 1965 SC…

Continue Reading

Scope of Section 149 IPC; Principles Section 141 IPC defines unlawful assembly to be an assembly of five or more persons. They must have common object to commit an offence. Section 142 IPC postulates that whoever being aware of facts which render any assembly an unlawful one intentionally joins the same would be a member…

Continue Reading