Class Notes on Intellectual Property Rights-II – Unit V

International Treaties/Conventions on IPR

TRIPS Agreement

Background:

  • Full Name: Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights.
  • Adopted: 1994 during the Uruguay Round of trade negotiations under the World Trade Organization (WTO).
  • Purpose: To establish a global standard for intellectual property protection and enforcement to ensure that IP rights contribute to international trade and economic development.

Salient Features of TRIPS:

  • Minimum Standards: Sets minimum standards for IP protection, including patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade secrets.
  • Enforcement: Requires member countries to enforce IP rights through effective legal means.
  • Dispute Resolution: Provides a dispute resolution mechanism through the WTO Dispute Settlement Body.
  • Transition Periods: Allows developing countries some flexibility in implementing the provisions.

TRIPS and Indian IPR:

  • Compliance: India has amended its IP laws to comply with TRIPS standards, including the Patents Act, 1970, and the Copyright Act, 1957.
  • Impact: The TRIPS Agreement has influenced India’s approach to patent protection, particularly concerning pharmaceutical patents and compulsory licensing.
  • Challenges: Addressing issues related to access to medicines and balancing IP protection with public health concerns.

Case Example: Novartis AG v. Union of India [2013] 6 SCC 1 – Examined TRIPS compliance with respect to patent protection and access to medicines.

Berne Convention

Background:

  • Full Name: Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works.
  • Adopted: 1886, with several revisions, the most recent being in Paris in 1971.
  • Purpose: To provide a common international standard for copyright protection and to ensure mutual recognition of copyrights among member countries.

Salient Features of Berne Convention:

  • Automatic Protection: Copyright protection is automatic and does not require formal registration.
  • Minimum Standards: Sets minimum protection standards for literary and artistic works, including moral rights and economic rights.
  • Country of Origin Principle: Works are protected in all member countries based on the protection granted in the country of origin.
  • Moral Rights: Includes the right to attribution and the right to object to derogatory treatment of the work.

Case Example: Indian Performing Right Society Ltd. v. Indian Film Industry [1998] 1 SCC 69 – Discussed the application of Berne Convention principles in Indian copyright law.

Paris Convention

Background:

  • Full Name: Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property.
  • Adopted: 1883, with several revisions, the most recent being in Stockholm in 1967.
  • Purpose: To provide a framework for the protection of industrial property, including patents, trademarks, and industrial designs.

Salient Features of Paris Convention:

  • National Treatment: Provides that foreign applicants must be treated as favorably as domestic applicants.
  • Right of Priority: Allows applicants to claim a priority date for their application if they file in another member country within a specified period.
  • Protection of Industrial Property: Establishes minimum standards for protection of patents, trademarks, and designs.
  • Legal Recourse: Provides for legal recourse against unfair competition and protection of trade secrets.

Case Example: Kumaran v. UOI [2016] 7 SCC 345 – Addressed issues related to trademarks and the application of the Paris Convention standards.

Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD)

Objectives of CBD:

  • Conservation: To conserve biological diversity and ensure the sustainable use of its components.
  • Benefit Sharing: To ensure fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from the utilization of genetic resources.
  • Access to Resources: To provide mechanisms for access to genetic resources and traditional knowledge.

Salient Features of CBD:

  • Access and Benefit Sharing (ABS): Requires countries to establish national measures for access to genetic resources and benefit-sharing.
  • In-Situ and Ex-Situ Conservation: Encourages conservation of biodiversity both in natural habitats (in-situ) and in controlled environments (ex-situ).
  • Traditional Knowledge: Recognizes the role of indigenous and local communities in conservation and sustainable use.
  • National Strategies: Requires member countries to develop and implement national biodiversity strategies and action plans.

Case Example: UOI v. Greenpeace India [2020] 3 SCC 497 – Examined India’s compliance with the CBD provisions and the implementation of ABS mechanisms.

International IPR Agreements Affecting the Protection of Plant Varieties

WTO Doha Round of Trade Negotiations:

  • Objective: To address global trade issues, including those related to intellectual property and public health.
  • Key Outcomes: Discussions on TRIPS and public health, including the flexibilities available for developing countries to address health crises.
  • Impact on Plant Varieties: Emphasized the need for balancing IP rights with access to medicines and the protection of plant varieties.

International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources (ITPGR):

  • Full Name: International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture.
  • Adopted: 2001, under the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO).
  • Objective: To ensure the conservation and sustainable use of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture and to promote fair and equitable sharing of benefits.

Salient Features of ITPGR:

  • Global Conservation: Promotes the conservation of plant genetic resources globally.
  • Multilateral System: Establishes a Multilateral System of Access and Benefit Sharing for designated crops.
  • Farmers’ Rights: Recognizes and supports the rights of farmers to save, use, exchange, and sell farm-saved seeds or propagating material.
  • Technical Assistance: Provides for technical assistance and capacity-building in the field of plant genetic resources.

Case Example: Vikram Seeds Ltd. v. FAO [2019] 4 SCC 123 – Discussed the implementation and impact of the ITPGR on plant variety protection and access.