-
Site Admin
Sher Singh @ Sheru Vs. State of U.P. [Allahabad High Court, 21-09-2016]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD Hon’ble V.K. Shukla, J.,Hon’ble Ramesh Sinha,J. andHon’ble Bharat Bhushan,J. Delivered on: 21.09.2016 Criminal Appeal No.1883 Of 2013 Sher Singh @ Sheru Vs.State of U.P. Counsel for Appellant :Dharmendra Singhal, Babit Kumar, J.S. Audichya, Rajul Bhargava;Counsel for Respondent :Government Advocate V.K. Shukla, J. Kidnapping for ransom of a 3 year
-
Site Admin
Dishonour of Cheque Case under Sec. 138 of NI Act: Legal Guide
What is Negotiable Instrument? A negotiable instrument is a document based on a contract, guaranteeing a promise of payment of a specific amount of money on a certain date or on demand, by the payee whose name is stated in the document. Negotiable Instruments are cash equivalents which can be converted to liquid cash subjected
-
Site Admin
Dinesh Shankar N.T. Vs. State [Kerala High Court, 12-07-2016]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON & ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JJ. O.P.(KAT)No.364 of 2015 Dated this the 12th day of July, 2016 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OA(EKM) 393/2015 of KERALA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DATED 21-05-2015 PETITIONER DINESH SHANKAR N.T., DEPUTY RANGE FOREST OFFICER, PERIA FOREST RANGE, KUNHOME FOREST STATION, NORTH WAYANAD DIVISION,
-
Site Admin
Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode Vs. Gold Finger Est. Pvt. Ltd. [Kerala High Court, 27-07-2016]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM P.B. SURESH KUMAR, J. A.R.No.25 of 2016 Dated this the 27th day of July, 2016 PETITIONER(S) INDIAN INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT KOZHIKODE, IIMK CAMPUS P.O., KOZHIKODE -673 570, THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER: LT. COL. JULIUS GEORGE (RETD), CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, IIMK. BY ADVS.SRI.S.VINOD BHAT SRI.LEGITH T.KOTTAKKAL RESPONDENT(S) GOLD
-
Site Admin
Forgery for purpose of cheating – Sec.468 IPC
Indian Penal Code (IPC) Section 468. Forgery for purpose of cheating Whoever commits forgery, intending that the1[document or Electronic Record forged] shall be used for the purpose of cheating, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine. CLASSIFICATION OF
-
Site Admin
Making a false document – Sec.464 IPC
Indian Penal Code (IPC) Section 464. Making a false document 1[A person is said to make a false document or false electronic record— First—Who dishonestly or fradulently— (a) makes, signs, seals or executes a document or part of a document; (b) makes or transmits any electronic record or part of any electronic record; (c) affixes
-
Site Admin
E-mail Spoofing – Sec.463 IPC
Indian Penal Code (IPC) 463. Forgery 1[Whoever makes any false documents or false electronic record or part of a document or electronic record, with intent to cause damage or injury], to the public or to any person, or to support any claim or title, or to cause any person to part with property, or to
-
Site Admin
Ajay Kumar Pandey Vs. In Re:- Piyush Verma Addl. Civil Judge (Junior Division) Jalaun at Orai [Supreme Court of India, 29-07-2016]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION [ KURIAN JOSEPH ]AND[ ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN ] JJ. July 29, 2016 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 115 OF 2016 AJAY KUMAR PANDEY Appellant(s) VERSUS IN RE:- PIYUSH VERMA ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION) JALAUN AT ORAI Respondent(s) J U D G M E N T KURIAN, J.
-
Site Admin
Bogus websites, Cyber Frauds – Sec.420 IPC
Indian Penal Code (IPC) Section 420. Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property Whoever cheats and thereby dishonestly induces the person deceived any property to any person, or to make, alter or destroy the whole or any part of a valuable security, or anything which is signed or sealed, and which is capable of being
-
Site Admin
Sending defamatory messages by e-mail – Sec.499 IPC
Indian Penal Code (IPC) Section 499. Defamation Whoever, by words either spoken or intended to be read, or by signs or by visible representations, makes or publishes any imputation concerning any person intending to harm, or knowing or having reason to believe that such imputation will harm, the reputation of such person, is said, except
Search
Category
- 1 Notes (18)
- Administrative Law (5)
- Advocates & Judges (22)
- AIBE Exams (3)
- Alternate Dispute Resolution (5)
- Analysis (2)
- Announcements (38)
- Articles (13)
- Banking Law (5)
- Bare Acts (1)
- Call for Papers (23)
- Case Laws (606)
- Certificate Courses (9)
- Civil Procedure (5)
- Class Notes (128)
- Company Law (7)
- Constitutional Law (7)
- Contract Law (7)
- Contract Law II (5)
- Criminal Law (10)
- Criminal Procedure Code (6)
- CS Executive (35)
- Cyber & IT Law (9)
- Cyber Laws (34)
- Cyber Security Tools (3)
- Digital Marketing (2)
- Environmental Law (6)
- Family Law II (5)
- Featured (4)
- Human Rights (5)
- Insurance Law (5)
- Intellectual Property I (6)
- Interpretation of Statutes (5)
- Jobs (85)
- Journalism & Media (31)
- Jurisprudence (5)
- KSLU (12)
- Labour Laws (5)
- Law Exams (19)
- Law of Evidence (5)
- Law of Torts (6)
- Law School Conferences (22)
- Law School Darshan (2)
- Law Schools (110)
- Legal Guides (1)
- LLB Exams (13)
- LLB Guide (147)
- LLM Exams (2)
- Matrimonial & Family law (6)
- Moot Court (6)
- News (23)
- News (84)
- News & Articles (9)
- PGD CyberLaw (6)
- Press and Registration of Books Act (1)
- Professional Ethics (5)
- Public International Law (5)
- Question Papers (11)
- Registration of Newspapers (Central) Rules (1)
- RERA / Real Estate Law (1)
- Resources for Lawyers (1)
- Right to Information (RTI) (5)
- Taxation (4)
- Transfer of Property (6)
- Tuition & Courses (1)
Recent Post
- HardenAD: Fortifying Your Active Directory in Minutesby Site Admin
- BloodHound: Unveiling the Labyrinth of Attack Paths in AD and AADby Site Admin
- Ping Castle: Free Active Directory Security Assessment Toolby Site Admin
- Indian Space Policy 2023: A Comprehensive Reviewby Site Admin
- All You Need to Know About Common Vulnerabilities, Attack Vectors, and Mitigation Techniquesby Site Admin